What’s not awful about 2023?

Coming to the end of a challenging year, let’s see if there were also some shining lights to help us trudge forward. Here is a list of 20+ reasons to celebrate:

  • OneGoal is helping teens in Chicago to finish high school and complete a year of trade school. The program started as an afterschool program for 23 students and now serves 15,000 nationwide.
  • Women came back into the labor force in 2023 after 800,000 left at the height of the Pandemic—moving into higher-paying jobs. The gender pay gap is at an all-time low. American women working full time still earn just 84 cents for every $1 men earn, but that’s up from 78 cents a decade ago.
  • The Camfed program has educated 1.8 million African girls, including 8,000 girls in sub-Saharan Africa in 2023. Women are the kick-starters of home-based small businesses in their countries.
  •  Finland joined the North American Treaty Organization (NATO), which will give Ukraine another ally thanks to the agreement with Turkey to let the Scandinavian country join. Sweden’s request is next up, but no doubt Russia will put an even stronger squeeze on Turkey and others in an attempt to prevent another pro-US entry. Who knows what piece of bounty Turkey might have gotten to achieve this important strategic goal?
  • The hole in the ozone layer is shrinking. (Slowly, don’t go crazy and drive faster; set your heat higher in the winter or at a lower temperature in the summer!) The CHIL United Nation’s trackers indicate by mid-century—that’s 26 years away—it could recover to 1980s levels.
  • The United States expected a recession in 2023 to take away jobs in exchange for a drop in inflation. Instead, over 2.5 million jobs were added while inflation slowed (not enough to please everyone). Egg prices are back to $2 a dozen after soaring to $4 at one time due to a disease that infected hens but impacted shoppers needing this kitchen table staple.
  • In the 19th century, nearly 50% of children worldwide died before they reached age 15. In 2023, the United Nations Population Division projects the world reaches a low in global child mortality, with just 3.6 percent of newborns dying by the age of 5. While this is excellent news, serious work remains to address the causes, care, and delivery of pregnant black women, who die in childbirth at 2.6 times the rate of white mothers.
  • Polio is expected to be eradicated worldwide by 2024, thanks to the efforts of Rotary International over decades. There were just 12 cases in 2023. The polio vaccine helped my generation avoid paralysis, living in steel iron lungs, and walking on crutches. This generation might need a reminder of the scourge they missed.
  • CRISPR, a gene-editing technique, has begun to treat sickle disease and blood disease. Sufferers require hospitalization and blood cell transfusions, often when the temperature outside changes to hot or cold. Researchers are now looking to apply what they have learned to other gene-based diseases.
  • Four Columbian kids survived 40 days in the jungle, aged 13, 9, 4, and 1. They survived a plane crash that killed their mother and were rescued by the Columbian military on June 9.
  • Beyonce’s Renaissance Tour is expected to draw $2.1 billion worldwide. Taylor Swift’s Era Tour: $1.4 billion from touring and merchandise, enlarging their status as an American icon. Both women have been recognized, along with Alicia Keys, for writing eight #1 songs on the Billboard 100.
  • Americans are traveling again—the number of air passengers—domestic and international are at pre-pandemic levels.
  • The leading cause of blindness worldwide, Blinding trachoma, is near 0. In 1996, the United nations aimed to eradicate the disease by 2020 by helping provide clean water, relieving overcrowding, and improving sanitation. The numbers were 189 million sufferers in 2014 and 105 million in 2022. Now, the target has been set for 2030.
  • Another win over disease has come with just 13 cases of the painful Guinea worm disease in 2022. This water-borne, sub-tropical disease removed disabled village workers from the farms, sending children to the fields, away from school. In 1986, the disease infected 3.5 million people. Former President Jimmy Carter fought to defeat the disease, wanting to end it in his lifetime. We’re hopeful he will, making it the second after smallpox to be eradicated by cleaning water supplies and digging deep wells.
  • Runners will commend the ability of Kevin Kiptum, a Kenyan runner, who set a new official record at the Chicago Marathon in October: 2 hours and 35 seconds. Or lament the bar has gone even lower!
  • American diners are selecting climate-conscious meals that are good for them as well as the planet. They’re called “climatarians” or “climavores.”
  • Many looted antiquities were returned. The Metropolitan Museum of Art is returning objects to Cambodia, Thailand, Turkey, and Greece. Thirty looted objects are being sent back to Italy by the California man who took them. The Museum of the Bible and Cornell University packed up 17,000 pieces and returned them to Iraq. The Smithsonian has agreed to give back to the families the “racial brain collection” acquired during the 19th century.
  • Gymnast Simone Biles came back and dominated the 2023 world championships and got a new fault named after her (The Biles II) so hard that nearly no one else, male or female, can complete it.
  • California is drought-free for the first time in years after snow and tropical storms—the reservoirs are filled.
  • We’re off the couch and back to the theaters! Thanks to movies like the pink-infused comedy “Barbie” and the less light-hearted “Oppenheimer,” a three-hour sit-down about the creation of the atomic bomb.

You may disagree with the ranking. Let me know or write your own list between watching football, eating tamales or lighting firecrackers!

Thanks to the Washington Post’s December 27, 2023: “No, 2023 wasn’t all bad, and here are 23 reasons why.”  And Nicholas Kristof, New York Times, December 23, 2023“This Was a Terrible Year, and Also Maybe the Best One Yet for Humanity.”

How Did the Lincolns Do Christmas?

Secular Christmas came alive in America in the late 1840s. A picture of Queen Victoria’s Christmas tree, complete with ornaments, appeared in the U.S. via telegraph. Other British seasonal traditions that made their way across the pond include Christmas cards, Charles Dickens’s “Christmas Carol,” and Clement Clark Moore’s poem, “A Visit from St. Nick.”

Someone dressed as St. Nicholas appeared in Concord, Massachusetts, on Christmas Eve in 1853. Two years later, in New Orleans, St. Paul’s Episcopal Church set up a Christmas tree aglow with candles and credited the German tradition. In Philadelphia in 1857, immigrants who’d become citizens said they were “naturalizing” the tree. An electrified tree did not appear until the 1880s, created by an employee of Thomas Edison. Yet the White House did not have a Christmas tree until 1889, when President Benjamin Harrison had a tree placed in an upstairs bedroom of the White House, maybe to please his grandchildren. Christmas became a federal holiday in 1870. Earlier, when Lincoln served in Congress for one term, he voted against making Christmas a holiday. He said state workers did not need another paid day off that regular workers would not receive.

Ah, but how did the Lincoln’s celebrate? In the 1860s souvenir hunters visiting the White House were so intent on collecting mementos (they cut scraps from the velvet drapes and swaths from the European carpet) that any decorations would be gone within a day. So, no tree went up at the White House.

Christmas as Unifying Force

Before the Civil War, Americans celebrated Christmas with their relatives from Europe or following their own religious traditions. These continued, but during and after the war a unique celebration of the family coupled with the yearnings of soldiers for home and for those left behind on the battlefield. The desire for peace and goodwill spoke to the immediate prayers of the nation.

Lincoln Christmas Traditions

Abe Lincoln and Mary, the Christmas before they left for the White House, probably would have joined other Springfield parents putting garlands of pine, evergreen boughs, and holly over the mantles and doorframes on Christmas Eve after their boys went to bed. Likely, Mary would be certain there would be Mistletoe and the chandelier would swing with the bough, spraying its scent throughout the dining room. Several bright red Poinsettia would grace the room. An array of culinary treats would include chicken salad, oysters, glazed fruit, venison, eggnog, and, of course, Southern biscuits. An orange and citrus tower would center the table with its fragrance, and a macaroon pyramid would be nearby for dessert. We recognize the turkeys and fruitcakes they expected at Christmas. (We will ignore the outcry of those who wonder if the fruitcakes are leftovers from that time.

Lincoln Family Christmas

The store registry at John Williams Co. store in Springfield had Abe Lincoln stopping by on Christmas Eve 1860, after his election but before the family left for Washington, to purchase four linen handkerchiefs, three gentleman’s silk handkerchiefs, and four children’s silk handkerchiefs. We know he also purchased fancy perfume for Mary. We hope he made sure the boys also had some sweets!

The Lincolns were known for their hospitality–once, months before an election, they invited 500 people to a gathering. They did a much smaller get-together in 1861, a Christmas party at the White House before the beginning of the war. The Lincolns did not send out Christmas cards during the Civil War. In 1862, the Lincolns visited soldiers at the many hospitals in Washington, D.C. Then the following year, Abe took his son to visit the troops with gifts of books and clothing with a tag: “From Tad Lincoln.” The President held a reception for his cabinet along with the White House Historical Society that, to this day, celebrates Christmas with special White House ornaments celebrating the Lincolns and other Presidential families.

Lincoln’s Winning Ways

The 16th President had a sixth sense of positive publicity. He knew Thomas Nash, the famous political cartoonist known for his work with Harper’s Weekly in the 1860s, created the elephant as the symbol of the Republican Party. For the New Year in 1863, Nash had drawn a picture of Santa visiting the troops on January 3.

Then, Lincoln asked Nash to create an image for December 31, 1864, entitled: “Union Christmas,” featuring Lincoln at the door offering cold and frost-bitten Southerner soldiers an invitation to join the Union. A second one featured Lincoln offering a Christmas Box to Jeff Davis, the Southern leader, with the message: “More war or peace and union?” In a few months, the surrender would be signed.

Long Memories Could Help Texans with Paxton

I hope the women of Texas and the men who love them have long memories. The next general election for Texas attorney general is a long way off, and it appears the State’s Leadership Triumvirate is banking on it.

Texans are suffering under a multi-year dictatorship over our minds and bodies. Our Triumvirate of “leaders” lack the equipment to understand a key issue vital to half the population of the Lone Star State and now are second-guessing the doctors who do.

In this case, Texas leaders appeal to a political faction clinging to the right wall, carved to fit nicely into gerrymandered sections of the state’s political landscape, thus far bringing reliable access to power for the Triumvirate.

Following this pattern, in 2021, Texas passed one of the most restrictive state bans that prohibits abortion after six weeks if the cardiac activity (the “heartbeat” law) of the fetus can be detected. In 2022, the Texas legislature passed the “trigger law” that prohibits abortion after fertilization, only granting exceptions for cases in which a pregnant patient risks death or “substantial impairment of a major bodily function.” The Texas language is the most restrictive language, first used in Texas and now being copied in other states.

The most recent stretch of Texas Attorney General Paxton’s power has impacted the life of Kate Cox, pregnant with a fetus suffering from trisomy 18, a fatal genetic disease. She appealed to the Texas district court to block the state’s enforcement of the ban, which cleared her for the procedure under an exception. In her appeal, Cox explained she risks losing her fertility and could lose her life if she continued to carry the fetus. Doctors told her the disease leaves an unborn child “virtually no chance of surviving,” and 95 percent of the fetuses with the disease do not live until birth, according to the Cleveland Clinic.

The Texas District Court cleared Cox for the procedure on Friday, but that night, the 9-GOP-member Texas Supreme Court, encouraged by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, put that decision on hold. On Monday, that court issued a seven-page opinion tossing out the District Court’s temporary restraining order, which would have blocked the state’s enforcement of the ban and cleared Cox for an abortion in Texas.

Expecting that ruling with her health deteriorating, Cox left Texas to have an abortion.

Ken Paxton bullied his way out of impeachment in September by threatening to find primary opponents for those in the House and Senate who voted against him, then following up on it. (The Texas House voted to impeach by 121-23, and the Texas Senate voted against by 16-14 (21 being required). His anger has him spending more time working against Republicans who voted against his deeds and pleasing the anti-abortionists than fulfilling the activities of a state’s legal leader.

Now, he’s stretching that tactic to bend doctors and even hospitals to his will and that of those who fund his political campaigns. His Texan constituents should be aware of the extent he will go to ensure his will is fulfilled.

Not Just Politicians Receive His Bullying

Before Cox left the state, Paxton released a letter threatening legal action against her doctor and other doctors and hospitals if they performed her (or any) abortion, pledging “civil and criminal liability including first-degree felony prosecutions.” He went further to say that the case did not fall into the exception of the Texas abortion law, and the (district court) judge was “not medically qualified to make this determination.” So, Paxton is? And the Texas Supreme Court, also made up of lawyers, is more qualified?

In a letter to Texas hospitals early this week, Paxton threatened to prosecute hospitals, doctors, and anyone who would assist in an abortion procedure. He threatens doctors with first-degree felonies and five years, up to life in prison. He goes so far as to discuss a review of hospital certification (which would threaten the hospital’s ability to serve the entire community, not just pregnant women) for those going against HIS will in their effort to deter a desperate, seriously ill pregnant woman from requesting an abortion.

“Even before winning an appeal (from a 9-GOP court),” Mary Ziegler, UC-Davis law professor, said, “This reflects his (Paxton’s) ultimate goal of wanting to go after abortion providers and supporters at all costs.”

Earlier, he went so far as to send out an advisory in 2022 to local prosecutors encouraging them to pursue criminal charges against abortion doctors with the threat of five-year prison sentences and offering the services of the AG’s office in assisting their prosecutions.

The court ruling appeared to endorse Paxton’s specific constructions on reproductive rights, according to Lara Portuondo, University of Houston law professor. “(This ruling) permits a green light precisely to the kind of intimidation campaign that you saw Ken Paxton doing here.”

Dr. Rick W. Snyder II, Texas Medical Association president, expressed a need for “legislative clarity to protect physicians so they don’t have to go to court (in these cases).”

Joanna Grossman, a professor at the Dedman School of Law at SMU, noted this current behavior is a continuation of what Paxton has done for three years and beyond enforcement through fear.

A few months ago, a group of 20 Texas women who had difficult /life-threatening pregnancies and experienced difficulty determining if their case would allow them to receive medical treatment in Texas petitioned the Texas Supreme Court for a determination of what is “reasonable medical judgment” in these cases. The Texas Medical Association has also asked for clarification so that, as the women’s case states, ” doctors do not have to wait until a mother is within an inch of death” before acting. A decision is expected in June.

Here’s what the Texas Supreme Court’s ruling against Kate Cox means for abortions (msn.com)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/12/07/texas-abortion-judge-ruling/

Texas Supreme Court Overturns Order Allowing Woman’s Abortion – The New York Times (nytimes.com)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/12/07/texas-abortion-judge-ruling/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/2023/12/12/abortion-kate-cox-texas-exceptions/c22695fe-993a-11ee-82d9-be1b5ea041ab_story.html

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/dec/12/texas-abortion-ken-paxton-kate-cox

The photograph is free art from wayhomestudios.